Once only a tool for scientists, artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an everyday tool, from voice assistants and targeted advertising to autonomous driving. It is used in a wide variety of applications from product recommendations to medical diagnosis. AI is now entering the legal field in many areas, such as in litigation forecasting, damages calculation, document review and document drafting.
As AI has progressed over time, it is now replicating more and more things that only humans had done before. This is now creating new legal issues. For example, if an AI invents something new, is the AI now an inventor? Currently, the answer is “no”, but then who is the inventor, if not the AI. Will there be new legal ethics impacts with respect to AI?
AI is a legal tool, but it also has replicates humans to some extent. This unique aspect of AI has the potential to create new ethical problems. An extreme example would be an AI model trained on confidential data, akin to an attorney, requiring it to be firewalled from certain new projects. There will also be simpler impacts, such as who is to blame when the AI makes a legal mistake.
With respect to patents, although AI inventions are similar to other types of software, its nature of being more human-like makes it more of a challenge. For example, the simple use of an AI model to replace a human operation would likely to not be considered patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. §101.
These artificial intelligence legal topics and more will be covered in the upcoming Volpe Koenig CLE Webinar Artificial Intelligence, Patents and ABA Ethical Considerations . In that webinar, they will discuss various AI issues that include:
- What is artificial intelligence;
- Basic Definitions;
- AI technology basics;
- Patenting artificial intelligence inventions, such as what can be patented, types of AI inventions, and claim strategies;
- AI inventorship/authorship;
- Lore surrounding artificial intelligence; and
- Potential ethical issues that artificial intelligence may create.
Subscribe
Recent Posts
- Artificial Ingenuity: Is Generative AI the New 'Person of Ordinary Skill' in Patent Law?
- The Expiration of the After Final Consideration Pilot Program 2.0 (AFCP 2.0)
- Patently Unclear: Why Result-Oriented Claims Don’t Make the Cut Under 35 U.S.C. § 101
- Make Your Invention The Priority, What Track-1 Can Do For You!
- Navigating Final Rejections in Patent Prosecution: AFCP 2.0 vs. 37 CFR § 1.116
- A Clear POV on Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. 101: Contour’s Claims Zoom Back Into Focus in Contour v. GoPro
- Understanding the Recent Federal Circuit Decision in Broadband iTV, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. on Patent Ineligibility
- Federal Circuit Clarifies Obviousness-Type Double Patenting in Allergan v. MSN Laboratories: The Impact of Patent Term Adjustments on First-Filed Patents
- The Risks and Rewards of Using Open Source Software
- Don't Let Your Trade Secrets Walk Out the Door With Your Employees: Patent Them!
Archives
- November 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- August 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- October 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017